John Rijnbout
My feedback
-
16 votes1 comment · Microsoft Graph Feature Requests » Cloud Communications · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →John Rijnbout
supported this idea
·
-
75 votes5 comments · Microsoft Graph Feature Requests » Teamwork (Teams) · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →John Rijnbout
supported this idea
·
-
11 votes2 comments · Microsoft Graph Feature Requests » Notifications · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Thank you for the additional information.
We’re reviewing the scenarios internally and we’ll get back to you as soon as we have something to share.John Rijnbout
supported this idea
·
-
94 votes7 comments · Microsoft Graph Feature Requests » Cloud Communications · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
We currently have a preview version of the feature in beta. You can read more about it and try it out here https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/graph/blogs/get-notified-of-presence-changes-the-microsoft-graph-presence-subscription-api-is-now-available-in-public-preview/
John Rijnbout
supported this idea
·
-
242 votesIn Backlog · 20 comments · Microsoft Graph Feature Requests » Cloud Communications · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →John Rijnbout
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment
We are the developers of an Attendant Console application suite and one of our features is augmenting contact directory information with presence information from a variety of sources and present that to the logged on attendants. Currently we are prototyping a presence connector for MSTeams. Presence is being collected and aggregated by a server based service process and as such the client credentials grant flow seemed to be the obvious choice to authenticate the service on MSGraph. However this requires the presence.read and presence.read.all permissions to be available as app permissions, which they are not. Currently we have a working work-around by logging on an user by username/password so we can rely on the delegated permissions, but that's not an ideal situation in terms of security - rather I would like to see the needed permissions implemented as app permissions as well.
TYI, Kind regards.